News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Goldman Is Telling Big Money Clients About Bitcoin by nartz on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @01:39AM (#15015803)
Why do people say it 'Cant be tracked'? Its a fully public ledger. I would think that it could be tracked much easier than dollars that remain liquid or laundered.
Re:What Goldman Is Telling Big Money Clients About Bitcoin by lagadu on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @06:41AM (#15016973)
The problem is the difficulty of tying an arbitrary amount of addresses to a person.

Anyone can generate any amount of addresses instantly out of nowhere and be paid to them. Lets say you have x btc that you received as payment from some illegal activity. You can make any number of payments to any number of addresses of your choice, some of which are yours (new addresses, so they're not associated with you yet), some of which are not. You still have control over all your btc but nobody knows what is "you" and what is someone else. While it's everything there in the blockchain for anyone to explore, if properly managed the address system does provide a high level of anonymity by current standards.

edit: a btc address is effectively just calculating a hash, behind it you have good old public key cryptography so it's very easy to generate and can even be done offline.

Re:What Goldman Is Telling Big Money Clients About Bitcoin by arca_vorago on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @01:41AM (#15015807)
Because that's why they want it over anonymousish paper money.
Re:What Goldman Is Telling Big Money Clients About Bitcoin by stale2002 on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @03:53AM (#15016283)
It is actually pretty difficult to track, if you know what you are doing.

All you have to do is use a mixer.

The advantage that it has over paper money is that I can almost instantly send it anywhere in the world, for cheap.

Re:What Goldman Is Telling Big Money Clients About Bitcoin by HNNoLikey on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @04:05AM (#15016338)
I've heard that bitcoin mixers can take care of completely/somewhat obfuscating coin ownership.

> According to Wikipedia: User can send his bitcoins on this service, pay small commission, and then receive the same sum of utterly different bitcoins.

If they're paid out to one address it still wouldn't provide the desired level of anonymity, if however they are paid out to multiple addresses belonging to the same user, I would imagine the anonymity level would increase but not totally since one could still add up payments made to different addresses whose total should amount to a given range.

Re:What Goldman Is Telling Big Money Clients About Bitcoin by phyalow on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @04:39AM (#15016458)
Yes possible but impractical when you split the new payments to multiple new addresses, in unequal amounts and at random times....
Re:What Goldman Is Telling Big Money Clients About Bitcoin by PeanutCurry on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @05:09AM (#15016589)
This has been what I've read as well. Unless a massive and coordinated entity like Five Eyes has decided to focus a significant amount of its resources on you, bitcoin mixers seem to provide 'adequate' levels of obfuscation.