Re:A Theory of Jerks (2014)
by revscat on Friday August 11, 2017 @09:44PM
(#14995877)
This strikes me as circular.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> the waiter messed up because they're a jerk
That's a subordinate clause where "jerk" is referring to the waiter, not the main subject, hence it's not circular.
And people think singular "they" is OK in writing.
Try:
the waiter messed up because he's a jerk.
That's not a unique problem of they:
"The man shoved the waiter because he was in his way."
Pronouns only have a few bits of information, everything else has to be inferred from context. (A big problem in natural language processing.)
Re:A Theory of Jerks (2014)
by tatterdemalion on Saturday August 12, 2017 @02:56AM
(#14996790)
This doesn't do anything at all to resolve the ambiguity in this sentence.
"They" is generally accepted as a singular gender neutral pronoun.
Re:A Theory of Jerks (2014)
by jon_richards on Saturday August 12, 2017 @12:35AM
(#14996488)
And has been since the Canterbury Tales! It's a modern development that it isn't considered "correct" English.
Re:A Theory of Jerks (2014)
by Normal_gaussian on Saturday August 12, 2017 @04:19AM
(#14997004)
600 years is long enough for me
Re:A Theory of Jerks (2014)
by oddlyaromatic on Saturday August 12, 2017 @11:52AM
(#14998354)
Here's a short review on the use of the singular "they". It is OK. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/singular-nonbi...
If this is such a problem, do you think it's a problem too that English doesn't distinguish between singular and plural you?