News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon by SXX on Friday August 11, 2017 @05:47PM (#14994610)
> I never buy from third-party sellers in Amazon

Does it actually make any sense now? Wasn't it confirmed many times that Amazon just ship it to you from closest warehouse even if it's item by 3rd party seller?

Re:I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon by noncoml on Friday August 11, 2017 @05:50PM (#14994634)
AFAIK there are three kind of items:

1. Sold and shipped by Amazon

2. Sold by third-party, fulfilled by Amazon

3. Sold and shipped by third-party

I never buy (3) and generally avoid (2) when there is a possibility of counterfeit, but otherwise I agree with you (2) is fine.

Re:I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon by christoph on Friday August 11, 2017 @06:38PM (#14994944)
I think there's a kind of 1.5 as well - Sold by Amazon, supplied by god knows who (co-mingled stock of varying authenticity - could by Amazon, could be Chinese knock off), fulfilled by Amazon.
Re:I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon by JangoSteve on Saturday August 12, 2017 @12:32AM (#14996480)
That's actually not 1.5, that's 1 that you just described. There is no option 1 that isn't co-mingled with inventory of unknown authenticity that (unless it happens to be an item that's never had inventory sent in by a 3rd party, but you have no way of knowing that).
Re:I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon by fencepost on Saturday August 12, 2017 @12:18PM (#14998470)
Depending on the item and seller "sold and shipped by third party" may actually be better - no mingled inventory, might even be direct from manufacturer.