That's entirely irrelevant. It doesn't matter if those processors were released last year of in the last century. It's Intel's current and best offer, and the facts speak for themselves: AMD's current offering matches Intel's perfomance while trouncing Intel's in price/performance ratio.
> that doesn't make an awful lot of sense given that their E lines are basically always sky high prices compared to other Intel chips).
That's Intel's problem. It makes no sense to try to downplay AMD's stellar performance just because Intel does some major price gouging.
That's entirely irrelevant. It doesn't matter if those processors were released last year of in the last century. It's Intel's current and best offer, and the facts speak for themselves: AMD's current offering matches Intel's perfomance while trouncing Intel's in price/performance ratio.
> that doesn't make an awful lot of sense given that their E lines are basically always sky high prices compared to other Intel chips).
That's Intel's problem. It makes no sense to try to downplay AMD's stellar performance just because Intel does some major price gouging.