News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by reillyse on Thursday August 10, 2017 @02:53PM (#14982894)
What a messed up article. I don't know this CEO but using a picture taken at a festival two years ago as proof of incompetence seems very cheap.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by matt4077 on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:07PM (#14983022)
Indeed–that image caption serves absolutely no purpose except to beat on someone who is at a low point anyway.

And it doesn't even make sense! Taking a vacation every now and then is likely to improve productivity, and for SoundCloud specifically, it seems almost necessary to go to Burning Man and mingle. The criticism is especially rich coming from a guy who looks at least twice as stoned in his official TechCrunch photo than the SC CEO at Burning Man.

Creating SoundCloud is more than 99.x% of people ever achieve, including me, the author, and the editor of this shameless excuse of an article. SoundCloud is obviously beloved by many. If they don't find a way to get those people to pay, they're in good company.

At least they're not selling to AOL.

Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by bad_user on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:22PM (#14983168)
How dare you suggest that people should take vacations and have a life?
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by gist on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:16PM (#14983723)
Bias actually makes for interesting reading and clickbait. That is what it's all about. It's not about being fair and balanced. And actually given that the truth does not matter to the vast majority of people reading Techcrunch (or honestly any publication) I am not sure it even would be a smart business strategy. People watch wrestling and they know it's fixed. People read fiction. This is another version of it.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by cuckcuckspruce on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:44PM (#14984050)
Ah TechCrunch, deciding to fill the gaping hole of bullshit that ValleyWag vacated.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by mful on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:26PM (#14983207)
Also full of dramatic, unsubstantiated claims such as:

> Now staff morale is in the toilet, the user experience is a mess, the subscription models are unappealing, competitors are growing rapidly and musicians are fleeing to other upload platform.

I really thought TechCrunch was getting better, but man this is bad journalism. It's like a hit piece in a high school newspaper.

Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by danso on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:16PM (#14983725)
The OP probably should have been a link to Axios, which is the outlet that broke the news; TC is just reblogging it and adding its own commentary/context: https://www.axios.com/soundcloud-asks-investors-to-support-r...
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by wyager on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:38PM (#14983312)
To be fair, the UX is a mess. The mobile experience is horrible and always tries to drag you to the app (which is not great), and SC is constantly trying to push the "social" aspect. I can't filter out "shares" or whatever from my feed, which means instead of listening to the artists I like, I end up listening to a bunch of random crap they share.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by narrowtux on Friday August 11, 2017 @06:02AM (#14988088)
What irked me about that one was that the UX being a mess can't possibly be only caused by the layoff woes 2 weeks ago.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by unclebucknasty on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:02PM (#14983580)
>always tries to drag you to the app

To be fair, this seems to be the unfortunate norm these days.

Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by danso on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:46PM (#14983415)
edit: Apparently the photo was changed within the hour. According to Google Cache, this is what was in the article:

http://imgur.com/a/N8OR9

http://archive.is/hkmkY

----

What was the original caption/photo? Right now, it says:

http://imgur.com/a/N5EcV

> SoundCloud CEO Alex Ljung would be replaced if the company receives the new funding

FWIW, in other articles, it's been insinuated that Ljung went off to Burning Man at a time when Rome was burning:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanmac/inside-the-storm-at-soundcl...

> By August 2014, it was abundantly clear that the SoundCloud’s advertising program, which would allow artists and labels to collect royalties, would not launch as planned. Despite Toig’s promises, not a single major label had agreed to a deal. The project launched with a eleventh-hour pivot to focus on independent creators, with Toig later apologizing at an all-hands meeting for failing to sign the majors...Ljung assured everyone in attendance that the label arrangements would eventually get done. A few days later, he flew to California and went off the grid. It was time for Burning Man.

Further down in the article:

> ...The stalled deals also affected internal operations at SoundCloud headquarters in Berlin. Though the $150 million round never closed, managers had been instructed to double the size of the company’s 150-person engineering team.Meanwhile, Ljung continued to travel the world. In May 2015, he spoke at a Burning Man–esque festival outside of Las Vegas called Further Future. In June, he showed up in an ad campaign for Italian luxury company Salvatore Ferragamo. When SoundCloud employees from around the world flew to Berlin for an August retreat, he was nowhere to be found.

Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by tequila_shot on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:52PM (#14983479)
Yes. The article you are referring to has been to the top of HN. And I think the buzzfeed article did a good job by speculating on the reasons why Sound Cloud may be doing bad with CEO not being available. This TechCrunch article, however uses just the image with no context to explain something which is _completely_ out of context for what this article is trying to convey.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by mikestew on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:54PM (#14984143)
Not only am I not surprised that the CEO of a music-based company is at Burning Man, I fully expect him to show up at SXSW as well. Anything less would almost seem like a dereliction of duty.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by sergiotapia on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:21PM (#14983788)
These press prostitutes know exactly what they're doing. Thank God for services like archive.is because otherwise they just blackhole everything scummy they do.

http://archive.is/j8cns

Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by welder on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:19PM (#14983136)
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by function_seven on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:36PM (#14983299)
Looks like they updated the image? Now I'm curious what they were using before.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by tekacs on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:48PM (#14983432)
This is what it looked like before the change: http://archive.is/j8cns
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by fweespeech on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:52PM (#14983480)
They did, it was a picture of the CEO at Burning Man iirc.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by Insanity on Thursday August 10, 2017 @03:17PM (#14983117)
I agree. I do not see how going to a festival is such a bad thing to do. It's actually a good thing to be able to still do something in your free time that you like..
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by unclebucknasty on Thursday August 10, 2017 @04:09PM (#14983647)
Haven't read TC in years, but is this type of "article" now the norm there?

The tone is converging on unhinged.

Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by kleborp on Friday August 11, 2017 @12:47PM (#14991733)
The author has been kind of a joke on underground hockey twitter (long story) about being the stereotypical self-unaware tech evangelist for some time. Not really surprised to see that it came from him.
Re:SoundCloud faces do-or-die vote by investors by unclebucknasty on Friday August 11, 2017 @01:19PM (#14992147)
Ah. Interesting. Seems like his editor might've noticed. Maybe TC likes the attention that comes with the controversy.