Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by yorwba on Thursday August 10, 2017 @06:11AM
(#14978180)
> So I think unless there's someone who can point to greater evidence that this is an internal graph, there's just no reason to believe it is.
So I think unless there's someone who can point to the actual internal graph, there's just no reason to believe this is fake.
The distribution this poll shows is not so outlandish as to be unbelievable, and importantly it does not lend itself to overwhelmingly support one side over the other. Why would anyone spend time and effort to fake it?
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by michaelchisari on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:39AM
(#14980758)
> Why would anyone spend time and effort to fake it?
It's a heated argument on the internet. There'd be plenty of incentive to fake a graph in order to bolster one's opinion.
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by yorwba on Thursday August 10, 2017 @12:03PM
(#14981018)
My point is that if you are going to fake a graph to bolster your opinion, you might as well fake one that actually bolsters your opinion, instead of just mildly suggesting that not everyone disagrees with you.
Re:Outraged about the Google diversity memo?
by michaelchisari on Thursday August 10, 2017 @02:49PM
(#14982865)
I'm really disappointed we're even having this conversation on Hacker News. A graph with no source, no methodology, no context is useless. We're computer programmers, we should know enough about data to recognize this and dismiss it until we have those things.
I could whip upa similar graph without breaking a sweat that says whatever I'd like, and it would have all the same hallmarks of this one. I could even do it in PHP using ImageMagick (if I felt masochistic) and fake the file header to say it was created using GD. Or build it in photoshop, and pull it into a binary editor.
So I think unless there's someone who can point to greater evidence that this is an internal graph, there's just no reason to believe it is.