Re:Jordan Peterson Interviews James Damore
by cSoze on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @07:15PM
(#14974658)
He's an engineer for Google (with a purported PhD from Harvard - likely to only be a MS) that wrote a 10 page article critiquing his company - specifically - for ignoring the science when making decisions about company culture. From someone with his credentials making these claims I expect 15+ peer reviewed sources with at least 1 review article from each field that studies the topic (sociology, economics, anthropology, psychology, biology).
Someone with his credentials should not expect to be spoon fed justifications for company hiring practices. If he had opened discussion on the validity of specific findings and which experiments contain the most valuable information for predicting benefits of policy changes, I don't think there would have been this outcry.
But if he wants to discuss the science he first needs to make it clear that he's read it.
Re:Jordan Peterson Interviews James Damore
by galacticpony2 on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @07:20PM
(#14974687)
You know, I for one maintain that he shouldn't have to do any of these things to avoid getting fired and getting branded a sexist by the dishonest media. But that's exactly what happened. Being more scientific wouldn't have helped him one iota. Keeping his mouth shut would've helped.
[0] Links from the paper in order not counting internal g/ go/ links, whatever those are (not all of them technically citations, but some are; many just to help point out that a technical definition is being used and a common parlance one the reader may have in mind shouldn't be used):
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25098770?seq=1#page_scan_tab_co...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
http://righteousmind.com/largest-study-of-libertarian-psych/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology#...
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1751-9004....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathizing%E2%80%93systemizin...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroticism
http://www.bradley.edu/dotAsset/165918.pdf (My favorite in-context just because the link text is "research suggests", a common phrase that all too commonly lacks any sort of citation or link of any kind.)
http://quillette.com/2017/07/15/time-stop-worrying-first-wor...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupational_fatality#Risk_fac...
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war...
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/01623095929...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068300/
https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/jaro2011/SPP457/um/23632422/Hakim...
https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msg/coffee-beans-di...
http://www.businessforum.com/WSJ_Race-on-Campus-05-06-2016.p...
https://www.city-journal.org/html/real-war-science-14782.htm...
https://heterodoxacademy.org/problems/
http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/social-psyc...
https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2016/08/06/a-non-femini...
http://www.warrenfarrell.net/Summary/
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-per...
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9280.00139
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rabble-rouser/201209/li...
https://nypost.com/2016/04/17/conservative-professors-must-f...
https://www.chicagoreader.com/Bleader/archives/2011/08/18/44...
https://www.google.com/search?q=political+correctness
https://bostonreview.net/forum/paul-bloom-against-empathy
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/07/why-it...
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691616659391...
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jjycJDLHc9oixA7FiG3-M2yJ...
http://www.spsp.org/blog/stereotype-accuracy-response