Ponzi Ponzi Ponzi.
A market maker is the guy who's tying to capture the spread, but they don't really go around trying to get the public to buy and sell.
Any vendor will buy a good at say, $9 and sell at $10. In the US there are many pawn shops saying "We buy and sell gold!" - it's never at the same price.
#1: A smart gold trader will buy low, sell high.. they will buy more gold when prices are low and advertise to sell more when the price is high.
Brokering fees are not calculated in with the base prices, though it would be once it's time to calculate returns.
When it's so easy that any 20 year old backend dev can issue a token, you should already know that no ETH-based app should be worth more than the same business model applied to a fiat currency.
Ding ding ding, winner! So many of these just have no point in being as companies, let alone as a token.
At The STC, we're going to end sex trafficking in just like Apple and Amazon (and now Google and Spotify) ended music piracy. To operate, we must be an extrajurisdictional company which makes cryptocurrencies a useful way to get investment and pay dividends. But we're not going to issue tokens -- only shares. Ethereum will help us keep track of share ownership and allow easy trading, but we're not a "blockchain company".
I hope we see a new wave of post-ICO companies using these technologies as a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. We're probably leaving money on the table by saying that and not hyping up tokens and tech. Oh well, we're going to create a valuable business instead.
Our main founder has had this idea for a while. But it wasn't until last year that cryptocurrencies showed they're going to be around and usable for non-geek users. This is crucial as it allows us to contract people (marketing, design, photography, transport, security, boarding, and on and on) without having to run risky front businesses to handle money or try to convince people that this strange internet coin money is useful.
The ICO craze annoys us because it blinds people to the real possibilities. It is our belief that within the next few months ICOs will need to measure up to ventures like our own and show true profit potential or at least some commonsense business fundamentals.
I can explain more in private (details in profile), or shortly we'll have more public details available and I can send you a link if you like.
But suffice to say that in the cities we operate, we will end up putting a significant dent in coerced sexual services.
The project is a from-scratch smart contract blockchain: including a new contract language
[0]:https://bravenewcoin.com/assets/Whitepapers/Ethereum-A-Secur...
When I tried to point out that the project should use some of that money to organize the software engineering aspect the founder got pissed off with me accusing me of trying to run the project. They had a second round and raised even more money (in addition to the insane capgains on their first round).
I check the github from time to time and it appears they've got at least 2 other devs involved and may actually bring a blockchain to market but this doesn't hide that fact that the project needed nowhere near the amount of money they raised. Hell they could've used a couple hundred grand from the first round and literally just paid a team of people to build the blockchain for them. did I get off of a gravy train? Yes. But there are more things to life than money.