News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Drowning in Data: sometimes it's cheaper to recompute by wfjackson3 on Wednesday July 07, 2010 @11:25AM (#1494423)
Nothing replaces the ability to use historical data to research something. Acquired data is historical information and the cost to re-acquire it (which is a falsity anyways) increases each time you throw it away.

It would be better to focus on forward looking data storage systems rather than re-acquisition.

Re:Drowning in Data: sometimes it's cheaper to recompute by CWuestefeld on Wednesday July 07, 2010 @02:32PM (#1494974)
...meaning that sometimes, we're better off keeping the data properly normalized.

Take that, NoSQL guys! :)

Re:Drowning in Data: sometimes it's cheaper to recompute by moomba on Wednesday July 07, 2010 @04:15PM (#1495271)
His quote, "Storage is pretty cheap but data acquisition and computation are even cheaper" seems a little out there. Data storage has gotten extremely cheep over the past decade. Computation on the other hand only will get much cheaper if it is considerably parallel.
Re:Drowning in Data: sometimes it's cheaper to recompute by aheilbut on Wednesday July 07, 2010 @04:15PM (#1495274)
This also means that compression for on-line files is enjoying a bit of a renaissance.