News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feynman on Fermat's Last Theorem (2016) by throwanem on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:17AM (#14941414)
> the job of practical engineering is to provide reliable, correct solutions in a timely, in-budget manner

Sure. And I'm sure you'll agree this job is easier to do in direct proportion to the celerity with which we eliminate impractical approaches.

Re:Feynman on Fermat's Last Theorem (2016) by auggierose on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:34AM (#14941468)
You can eliminate impractical approaches all day long. At some point you have to start with the practical approach that you know will work a-priori.
Re:Feynman on Fermat's Last Theorem (2016) by throwanem on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:35AM (#14941701)
When you have the option, sure! Not all problems are so tractable.
Re:Feynman on Fermat's Last Theorem (2016) by auggierose on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:50PM (#14942054)
Granted. Still, I think there is a fundamental difference: In theoretical physics, a good theory of how things work (or how they definitely don't work) is enough as the result of your work, you don't need a working product in the end. In practical engineering, you do!

Let me also add that I am serious about theoretical engineering, actually that's one of my favourite occupations, together with practical engineering.