News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch. Parent comment

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by celticninja on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:11AM (#14940551)
I think the lack of substance is due to the lack of substance in the answers provided by the company.

If I was a potential user of the service and I received these responses I doubt I would feel comfortable in accepting the offer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by erikrothoff on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:19AM (#14940861)
The article by the author would be a great place to add some substance, no?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by chillwaves on Sunday August 06, 2017 @02:40PM (#14942709)
Are you suggesting the blogger should flesh out Airmule's policy? It seems for something that is the core of their business model, Airmule should have a policy written and ready to reference.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by tprophet on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:33PM (#14943698)
They do - their ToS. And it appears to put all liability on the passenger. They haven't substantively addressed reasonable and fair questions around this.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by celticninja on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:55AM (#14941100)
I agree but the substance can only come from the company, ie fuller answers
[ Parent | on HN ]