Re:The Full 10-Page Anti-Diversity Screed Circulating Intern...
by aeriklawson on Saturday August 05, 2017 @06:42PM
(#14938355)
Jumping from a few studies about infants and monkeys to "...you can assume that there are at least some biological differences in behavior between the sexes - and thus differing workplace representation is not necessarily 100% derived from social pressures." is far, far from enough evidence and extremely hand-wavy to make a scientific argument here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Full 10-Page Anti-Diversity Screed Circulating Intern...
by DuskStar on Saturday August 05, 2017 @06:52PM
(#14938412)
There isn't really a leap. All I'm saying is that we have evidence for some gender differences that are rooted in biology, and thus we cannot assume that other differences have no biological component. Which is what asserting that 100% of a gender gap is caused by social pressures does.
Re:The Full 10-Page Anti-Diversity Screed Circulating Intern...
by AlexandrB on Saturday August 05, 2017 @07:15PM
(#14938537)
It's very convenient to hand-wave away the problem as "biological differences". Until we have some direct link between biology and preference for software development I think the wiser course of action is to try to get more women interested in the field. I mean why not? That's not to mention that open discrimination against women in numerous fields is a thing that happened within the lifetimes of people that are still alive today. It seems foolish to think that's all been fixed already.
Re:The Full 10-Page Anti-Diversity Screed Circulating Intern...
by humanrebar on Saturday August 05, 2017 @07:37PM
(#14938665)
> I mean why not?
Why not have a broad-based program to appeal to all demographics? Black Americans are also underrepresented. Rural children have less access to certain kinds of resources like magnet STEM schools.