Re:Seed funding slows in Silicon Valley
by JohnnyConatus on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @08:00PM
(#14915819)
Yup. Assume there's two founders both of which draw a 50k salary, likely after months of bootstrapping. 400k is not even three engineers in SF.
Re:Seed funding slows in Silicon Valley
by seanp2k2 on Thursday August 03, 2017 @01:16AM
(#14917108)
400k is like the fully-loaded cost of a single engineer if you're trying to hire "top talent" and actually get them to come work for you (i.e. they're valuing any equity you're offering at the likely result of $0).
But those "top talent" engineers will be starting their own company so you don't have to worry about that.
As I keep saying: investors that only invest in SF/SV should just skip the middle man and cut checks directly to property speculators.
Plenty of investors do that - they are called hard-money lenders. And it was such a great business its given rise to LendingHome and others in that space.
Re:Seed funding slows in Silicon Valley
by cassieramen on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @07:38PM
(#14915665)
Can anyone who was at a seed stage startup 5 years ago provide some insight into what salary looked like? I moved here about 2 years ago and constantly here how crazy housing and salary have gotten in just the last few.
Re:Seed funding slows in Silicon Valley
by kurttheviking on Thursday August 03, 2017 @02:03AM
(#14917301)
We were seed stage in 2011. We squeaked by in Redwood City on ~$30k/yr salary sharing 1-bedroom apartments which ran about $1,200/mo. That same unit now rents for $3-4k/mo.
Cost of living, office space, employees (due to the cost of living) has to be a factor here. Maybe $500k was viable a few years ago in the Bay Area, but imagine these days a company NEEDS a larger seed round in order to get to a viable state.