News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Deconstruct Almost Anything, by a Software Engineer by jcromartie on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @09:39AM (#1490910)
The thing is, I don't think that any amount of study lets you understand lit crit. It just lets you produce it and nod in agreement at other regurgitations.
Re:How to Deconstruct Almost Anything, by a Software Engineer by michael_dorfman on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @10:47AM (#1491106)
Speaking as one who actually understands it, I don't know what makes you think you are qualified to claim otherwise.

I don't understand a lot of high-level physics, but that doesn't lead me to imagine that physicists just sit around bullshitting each other all day.

Re:How to Deconstruct Almost Anything, by a Software Engineer by three14 on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @01:15PM (#1491608)
That's spot on.

I don't understand a lot of high-level physics or Continental Philosophy, but the same process that leads me to believe that the physicists aren't sitting around BSing all day leads me to believe that the philosophers are.

(Which is to say, I read enough intro surface level articles that are supposed to give a hint of what you get into once you do begin to understand and talk to people about the same, and form an outsider's opinion. Same process, different results with the two fields.)

Re:How to Deconstruct Almost Anything, by a Software Engineer by btilly on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @01:27PM (#1491640)
I don't understand a lot of high-level physics, but that doesn't lead me to imagine that physicists just sit around bullshitting each other all day.

I'm guessing you aren't familiar with string theory then. :-P

/duck

Re:How to Deconstruct Almost Anything, by a Software Engineer by Retric on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @02:19PM (#1491808)
There is an easy test to see if a subject has inherent meaning or not. Just submit a randomly constructed article to the related journal and see if they publish it.

PS: Guess which side won?

Re:How to Deconstruct Almost Anything, by a Software Engineer by michael_dorfman on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @03:19PM (#1492049)
Not the side you think.

Sokal punked a minor journal that was not particularly well known in the field. His book with Bricmont, attacking "postmodernism", on the other hand, was published by a major publisher, even though large swaths of it had been thoroughly debunked.

Re:How to Deconstruct Almost Anything, by a Software Engineer by Retric on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @03:50PM (#1492152)
No, I was talking about a more personal connection. In the publish or perish environment it's easy to submit gibberish that sounds reasonable just to get another paper out there.