Re:Heretical Things Statistics Tell Us About Fiction
by gwern on Sunday July 30, 2017 @02:12PM
(#14887103)
You'll be amused to know that similar experiments have been run for music:
2006: "Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market" http://www.princeton.edu/~mjs3/salganik_dodds_watts06_full.p...
Salganik & Watts 2009 "Web-Based Experiments for the Study of Collective Social Dynamics in Cultural Markets" http://www.princeton.edu/~mjs3/salganik_watts09.pdf
2008: "Leading the Herd Astray: An Experimental Study of Self-fulfilling Prophecies in an Artificial Cultural Market" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3785310/
Re:Heretical Things Statistics Tell Us About Fiction
by bbctol on Sunday July 30, 2017 @01:22PM
(#14886897)
Similar to the plot of "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Menard,_Author_of_the_Q...
Re:Heretical Things Statistics Tell Us About Fiction
by ivanbakel on Sunday July 30, 2017 @09:03PM
(#14888838)
I wouldn't agree. Menard is about authorship of a rewritten identical work - the GP was talking about people selecting works to potentially produce a different canon, and there's no question of an author.
Re:Heretical Things Statistics Tell Us About Fiction
by bbctol on Monday July 31, 2017 @09:34AM
(#14891775)
Right... but it's similar.
Re:Heretical Things Statistics Tell Us About Fiction
by kartan on Sunday July 30, 2017 @01:38PM
(#14886971)
At "How the Mona Lisa became so overrated" from Vox, you can see a unique circusntance that made the picture legendary beyond its initial merit.
Re:Heretical Things Statistics Tell Us About Fiction
by cafard on Monday July 31, 2017 @11:00AM
(#14892598)
Well maybe, but see http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2398/2398-h/2398-h.htm#leonar... from 1873.
How much of the canon would turn out the same?