Re:SoundCloud's Collapse
by lukaslalinsky on Sunday July 30, 2017 @08:44AM
(#14885702)
It was a platform for producers, not DJs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
But the underlying issue is that those DJ tracks many times technically did need permission from copyright holders to be posted. Unfortunately dealing with this w/o a ton of money is just a failing exercise.
Soundcloud is still good to get DJ mixes from DJ's I like, but I can seeing it go away just due to all of the costs that would accompany trying to ensure they have the right to share everything that is posted by users.
>> But the underlying issue is that those DJ tracks many times technically did need permission from copyright holders to be posted.
What the parent and I are saying though is that DJ mixes were a small part of the content in the early days. It wasn't created to host DJ mixes or marketed as that initially. Producers/songwriters/amateurs were the bulk of the content. SoundCloud could have built a decent business by banning copyrighted material and only dealing with original works. There was never any need to get into the messy licensing business.