News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GNU Ring 1.0 released by rvern on Friday July 28, 2017 @08:44AM (#14873795)
It's not necessary to sync history and contacts between devices in a peer-to-peer way because there is no network externality for synchronizing data. You could use a centralized service to sync the encrypted data. If the centralized service ever does things you don't like, you can change to another centralized service or host your own, and, importantly, you can do so without being affected by what other people do.

Communication platforms provide more value when they have more users, while centralized synchronization services don't provide more value because they have more users. So it's fine for synchronization services to be centralized, while it's not fine for communication platforms to be centralized.

Re:GNU Ring 1.0 released by rrix2 on Friday July 28, 2017 @05:47PM (#14877859)
If I own two devices, logged in to a chat service on the same account, and they have different chat histories and contact lists because there's no account sync, I will throw that chat service in the trash can.
Re:GNU Ring 1.0 released by rvern on Saturday July 29, 2017 @01:48AM (#14879735)
This has nothing to do with the synchronization service being peer-to-peer or not.