News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by tnecniv on Thursday July 27, 2017 @06:02PM (#14870030)
> I don't have any trouble reading English, but papers are almost universally written in a way that is more complicated than necessary.

This is a function of two things. The first is that venues often have strict page limits for their submissions. Authors typically have a lot to say and not a lot of space to say it, so they pick language that is precise, dense, and typically colorless. The second is that every domain has a lot of style and nomenclature that the layman won't know. It can be learned, but you must remember scientists write for each other, not for the layman.

Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by lucb1e on Thursday July 27, 2017 @06:44PM (#14870362)
The first point: fair enough. I'd still see that as a shortcoming of the medium and something to be solved (rather than "just the way it is"), but that's reasonable.

The second: I was talking about reading papers from my own field. That I don't understand a Biology paper (which indeed I don't -- I've tried) is perfectly understandable, but infosec papers shouldn't (and don't) contain any unknown lingo to me. It's just a very convoluted way of writing.

Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by visarga on Friday July 28, 2017 @12:33AM (#14871991)
Regarding short dense papers: have you seen the infamous SELU paper? It's got an epic 93 page appendix.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02515