News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ghost 1.0. Parent comment

Re:Ghost 1.0 by amouat on Thursday July 27, 2017 @01:13PM (#14867331)
They have their own installer now, that must have taken a _lot_ of work. I think they'd have been much better served by producing a Docker image and telling self-hosters to use that. Would have been easier, much more portable and less errorprone. As it is, the official Ghost image leave a lot to be desired.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ghost 1.0 by zimpenfish on Friday July 28, 2017 @06:44AM (#14873286)
I'm 100% not going to be installing it on my bare server. If they don't come out with a Docker image themselves, presumably someone else will (or I guess I'll make my own.) But it's definitely not running uncontainered.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ghost 1.0 by pascalandy on Sunday July 30, 2017 @11:48AM (#14886432)
You guys should follow this issue: https://github.com/docker-library/ghost/issues/65

Looks like the Ghost team is welling to share an official Ghost Docker image after all :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ghost 1.0 by amouat on Friday July 28, 2017 @06:50AM (#14873304)
The thing is, it's not as easy as it sounds - take a look at the issues on the official image :(
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ghost 1.0 by tedmiston on Thursday July 27, 2017 @02:45PM (#14868194)
More info on the new CLI / installer here:

https://docs.ghost.org/docs/ghost-cli

[ Parent | on HN ]