News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Intergalactic Winds That Built the Milky Way by lawless123 on Thursday July 27, 2017 @07:24AM (#14864220)
eh..

>"The atoms that built the solar system, the planets, and even our own bodies may have come from another galaxy perhaps as far away as one light-year—nearly 6 trillion miles."

Must be a typo.

Re:The Intergalactic Winds That Built the Milky Way by sukhdev on Thursday July 27, 2017 @08:31AM (#14864630)
Yeah.. the Milky Way alone is 100,000 light years across.
Re:The Intergalactic Winds That Built the Milky Way by cybervegan on Thursday July 27, 2017 @09:36AM (#14865084)
I saw that too. Probably should have been a "giga-light year" or something.
Re:The Intergalactic Winds That Built the Milky Way by a_brawling_boo on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:51AM (#14865830)
Came here to post :-) Considering the nearest star is about 4 light years away it doesn't seem that impressive.
Re:The Intergalactic Winds That Built the Milky Way by netman21 on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:57AM (#14865893)
Photons exciting particles are not winds. I hate these metaphors. Like the Solar Wind. It can misguide very smart people. I was sitting on a plane next to a former deputy director of NASA. After retiring he became a professor in Ann Arbor, where I received my aerospace engineering degree. I asked him to explain how the solar winds accelerate away from the sun. He proceeded to explain it was just like the throat of a rocket engine. I was so shocked I stopped talking to him. At a density of 3 "atoms" per cubic centimeter the solar winds are closer to vacuum than the very best vacuum achievable in a laboratory, by a factor of 30! There is no fluid dynamics that works when particles cannot interact with each other. Navier-Stokes works on real fluids, not on vacuum. So call me when The Atlantic has an article titled Intergalactic Currents That Built The Milky Way.
Re:The Intergalactic Winds That Built the Milky Way by visarga on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:11AM (#14865413)
Over the years I have seen astronomy become more like biology - diverse both in the kinds of objects it describes and their behavior.