Re:Swedish Government Scrambles to Contain Damage from Data ...
by rhblake on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:02AM
(#14865326)
But crucially not intent to commit treason. Gross negligence, sure (this she also admitted to). And I agree that she - and several others - ought to be punished much harder. But being naïve and incompetent (basically "yeah this is a problem but IBM can't provide people with security clearance yet, it takes too much time, and we're too far into the process and if we stop now many things - such as giving out driver's licenses and checking them - won't work for a while")... is, again, not treason.
Just like involuntary manslaughter is not murder, and so on.
Here's the definition by the way, 19 kap. 1 § brottsbalken: https://lagen.nu/1962:700#K19
Re:Swedish Government Scrambles to Contain Damage from Data ...
by duncan_bayne on Thursday July 27, 2017 @06:02AM
(#14863903)
Is that word from the same root as arquebus?
Re:Swedish Government Scrambles to Contain Damage from Data ...
by depressedpanda on Thursday July 27, 2017 @03:48PM
(#14868774)
Yes, correct: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkebusering#Etymologi
Ultimately, both words come from low German "hakebusse".
Re:Swedish Government Scrambles to Contain Damage from Data ...
by solnyshok on Thursday July 27, 2017 @03:23AM
(#14863291)
for those who does not speak swedish (like me). google translate says "firing squad in the courtyard"
I would say that is having intent if anything. I love my country but I think she should be punished a lot harder. Arkebusering på slottsgården. But since that will never happen, 12 years in jail is probably enough.