Re:Why has regional income convergence in the U.S. declined?...
by tdb7893 on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @03:44PM
(#14859523)
I've found that I prefer living in the Midwest and having an extra thousand or so a month for travel and stuff than living in a more hipster city.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why has regional income convergence in the U.S. declined?...
by mywittyname on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @05:30PM
(#14860552)
Midwestern cities are experiencing housing inflation too. Urban houses that were 140k five years ago are well over 200k now.
Re:Why has regional income convergence in the U.S. declined?...
by closeparen on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @08:29PM
(#14861649)
Intuitively it seems pretty rare for Midwesterners to live in cities or "urban" houses. Most of us seem to be in the metro areas, but in freeway-connected suburbs, not urban cores.
Re:Why has regional income convergence in the U.S. declined?...
by tdb7893 on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @09:37PM
(#14861974)
Yeah. I'm paying 1k a month for 1k square feet about 15 minutes from Minneapolis. When I want to do stuff in the city it's pretty easy to drive or use Lyft. I spend most of my time camping, playing board games, or doing martial arts and none of those are improved by actually living in a city so it makes little sense for me to live in one. Not everyone has the same hobbies so I understand if some people need cities but I talk to a lot of people who are paying 3k a month on the west coast and living a very similar life