News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:110 N.F.L. Brains by Touche on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @02:18PM (#14850414)
Thanks for the reply. This is what I'm trying to understand myself. I didn't see the 9% number in the article. I did see the mention about selection bias. So I wonder what the true numbers are here. If it's 9% then that explains well enough why so many ex-players don't show strong signs of CTE (by strong I mean long-term memory loss or worse).
Re:110 N.F.L. Brains by nerfhammer on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @02:30PM (#14850541)
The 9% is assuming that 100% of unknown cases are in fact negative.

This study showed that 110 of 111 players tested had CTE. But many of their families consented because they suspected CTE already, so it's not a random sample and therefore you can't generalize that to the rest of the population. 110 is 9% of the population of 1300 deceased players for the given time period. CTE is normally extremely rare.

Re:110 N.F.L. Brains by tedunangst on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @03:54PM (#14851301)
Why is the total population deceased players and not all players?
Re:110 N.F.L. Brains by nerfhammer on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @04:11PM (#14851444)
The only test for it requires dissection of the brain
Re:110 N.F.L. Brains by steanne on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @03:57PM (#14851336)
because you can't test the living ones