MS Paint is here to stay

Re:MS Paint is here to stay by orf on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @09:29AM (#14847540)

Yes, and the person I was replying to works in a place that seems to allow users to install random software from the internet. Thats 99.99% of your attack surface, why not restrict that?

I'm not going to get into the details of sandboxing here, but needless to say managed applications running in a sandbox are a big improvement over unmanaged, unsigned applications running with admin rights.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MS Paint is here to stay by sathackr on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @09:58AM (#14847707)

Agreed. See comment to your sibling post.

Sadly even now I run into large software companies that require users to have local admin privileges(and disable UAC) for their software to function correctly. And that's in the finance sector.

I've been dealing mostly in the healthcare sector now and it's even worse. Particularly with imaging software vendors. I deal with some that still only support Windows XP.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MS Paint is here to stay by semi-extrinsic on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @08:06PM (#14852881)

I've seen companies still distributing software updates on floppies, for that $25k spin-a-ma-thingy in the corner with the proprietary interface to the Win98 PC, that keeps on working and delivering useful results.

A famous example from the car industry is McLaren having a stack of 25-year-old Compaq LTE 5280 laptops, running DOS, because that's the only machine that will run the proprietary CA card module for the diagnostic software for the McLaren F1 (106 cars produced '92-'98, 100 left today, each valued north of $10 million).

[ Parent | on HN ]