Re:Microsoft Paint to be killed off after 32 years
by dcole2929 on Monday July 24, 2017 @01:17PM
(#14840460)
Exactly this. It's nice that lightning theoretically gives you more throughput but it's completely pointless if the signal has to get transformed a half dozen times between device and ear.
And all the nicer phones aren't going to lightning cables either because the Pro Audio community (the people primarily buying $3-400 non Beats headphones) would revolt.
Re:Microsoft Paint to be killed off after 32 years
by TylerE on Monday July 24, 2017 @04:26PM
(#14842323)
I dunno. Decent cans don't generally drive well from phones anyway - so you're stuck with an external amp. Many amps have integrated DACs... why not just feed digital audio to the amp/dac via lightning?
Re:Microsoft Paint to be killed off after 32 years
by dm319 on Monday July 24, 2017 @04:17PM
(#14842256)
Yes, has anyone looked at the quality of the DAC in the 'dongle'?
Re:Microsoft Paint to be killed off after 32 years
by probablybanned on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @02:35AM
(#14845601)
Some tests are referenced in this article:
In my case so that I can use, with appropriate adapters in some cases, reasonably nice over-ear headphones (Beyerdynamic, Grado and Seinheiser). Do I really need several stages of modulation, propogation, reception and demodulation between me and my signal?