Re:Cryptoeconomics: Paving the Future of Blockchain Technology
by solotronics on Saturday July 22, 2017 @09:59PM
(#14830524)
it is literally impossible to do fractional reserve lending with Bitcoin. each coin has chain of custody back to the inception by mining reward (blockchain) so you can't send BTC you do not own. an altcoin could be built for fractional reserve lending where the coins are created by some form of consensus by a group of authorities. you could trade BTC and this theoretical altcoin but really we already have digital fiat currency for this purpose.
Re:Cryptoeconomics: Paving the Future of Blockchain Technology
by PeterisP on Sunday July 23, 2017 @08:38AM
(#14831981)
Fractional reserve lending of bitcoin would happen in the same manner as fractional reserve lending of gold coins.
E.g. a bank attracts deposits of bitcoin (i.e. the bank gets the bitcoin, the customer gets an IOU/note in legal records saying that the bank owes them a bitcoin), lends these bitcoins out, some of the lent bitcoin get deposited in another bank and re-lent, etc. In this manner the on-chain bitcoins travel around faster, and the total money supply (bitcoin + all bitcoin-denominated IOU's) can easily grow.
Re:Cryptoeconomics: Paving the Future of Blockchain Technology
by EGreg on Saturday July 22, 2017 @10:29PM
(#14830597)
That's not how fractional reserve lending works. Banks issue their own credit lines backed by Bitcoin. And you can't stop them from doing that.
Re:Cryptoeconomics: Paving the Future of Blockchain Technology
by solotronics on Sunday July 23, 2017 @12:41PM
(#14833107)
I would argue that it's not really backed by Bitcoin since it isn't on the block chain. Who is backing the lending by sending real Bitcoins? The bank would never do that they would get scammed constantly.
However, that presupposes that nobody starts performing fractional reserve lending using bitcoin as a currency. If that is allowed, then we're back to the existing banking system and it's varying supplies of money in proportion to banking debt. Nothing has really changed except that we have slightly more efficient inter-bank exchange mechanisms...unless we get a proliferation of alt-currency lending models, in which case we're back in the US wildcat banking era (circa 1840's) - a period that was not exactly renowned for its financial stability.
Alternatively, in the hypothetical world (because it's really quite hard to stop) where there is no bank lending any more... then we have the problem of how is a modern economy going to work without banking debt? As you say, lots of interesting questions on the economics side.