News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pass: A standard Unix password manager by hiq on Friday July 21, 2017 @08:14AM (#14819748)
If your master password leaks you are exposed on every website where you used this scheme (and you should then change every password), so on the security side this is inferior to a master password granting access to uncorrelated passwords.
Re:Pass: A standard Unix password manager by amelius on Friday July 21, 2017 @08:22AM (#14819785)
Well, you can add a salt to this scheme.

I know, it's not perfect, but it beats carrying around password files between devices.

Re:Pass: A standard Unix password manager by jbg_ on Friday July 21, 2017 @08:27AM (#14819822)
But you would just need to carry the salt around instead. You're just trading convenience for (significantly) lower security.
Re:Pass: A standard Unix password manager by amelius on Friday July 21, 2017 @08:34AM (#14819862)
Yes, it's a trade-off.

By the way, I'd prefer to have a password manager on my phone (or smartwatch), and have it beam my password to my keyboard by NFC. But this solution does not exist yet.

Re:Pass: A standard Unix password manager by hiq on Friday July 21, 2017 @11:09AM (#14821119)
As the other commenter pointed out, you need to carry your salt with you to deduce the actual password. On top of that, you need to keep your salt secret, otherwise it is trivial to deduce your password. So your system [password = hash(master password, salt, domain)] is exactly the same as a master password protecting several other ones. Just use your salt as a password directly at this point...