Re:A hacker stole $31M of Ether – how it happened, and what ...
by harryh on Friday July 21, 2017 @09:29AM
(#14820333)
Again, the question is who you trust, and that remains a moral choice, not an objective, empirical choice.
Oh come on. It absolutely is an empirical choice. Crypto-currencies have a very short history and that history is CHOCK FULL of people losing their money due to various forms of incompetence and graft.
Storing your money in a bank in a western democracy has centuries of history with extremely rare losses.
Please.
Re:A hacker stole $31M of Ether – how it happened, and what ...
by meepmorp on Friday July 21, 2017 @10:35AM
(#14820838)
>Storing your money in a bank in a western democracy has centuries of history with extremely rare losses.
While I agree with your overall point, I think you're glossing over the historical instabilities in the banking system. Bank runs, failures, and physical robberies were pretty common until comparatively recently (in the US, at least - the 19th century was chock full of them).
Re:A hacker stole $31M of Ether – how it happened, and what ...
by harryh on Friday July 21, 2017 @10:41AM
(#14820883)
Even in the dark days before the FDIC losses in US banks were rarer than what we see in cryptocurrencies today.
Re:A hacker stole $31M of Ether – how it happened, and what ...
by return0 on Friday July 21, 2017 @10:57AM
(#14821034)
Cryptocurrencies offer the opportinity to test the waters with new models. If we go by the thinking "keep what works", society would have never changed. I agree that they have big failures to show, but i think it's still early to tell.
You might be right that governments are more evolved and have more history but that doesn't make them universally better.