News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by laythea on Thursday July 20, 2017 @01:07PM (#14814317)
I second that. HN is good for that reason and also the lack of half page ads on another popular website SD.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by WhitneyLand on Thursday July 20, 2017 @04:05PM (#14815810)
Sorry, SD? The acronym is not clicking, would like to make sure I'm not missing a site with benefits similar to HN, even if it requires viewing a few half page ads. Thanks,
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by nsp on Thursday July 20, 2017 @05:29PM (#14816452)
Slashdot.com - haven't checked it in years but was a similar tech focused site with above average comments, its heyday was late 90s-early 2000s iirc
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by laythea on Friday July 21, 2017 @10:00AM (#14820582)
Sorry - yes Slashdot. It is awful nowadays, but I started there. Somebody should tell them.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by Zuider on Sunday July 23, 2017 @07:49AM (#14831819)
Agreed. Slashdot has become unusable.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by dancsi on Thursday July 20, 2017 @05:46PM (#14816583)
Maybe it is Slashdot?