News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by infogulch on Thursday July 20, 2017 @12:32PM (#14813931)
Thank you, dumbneurologist for the reality check, and thank you HN commenters for being the most down-to-earth no-bullshit community I've ever found. The breadth of expertise of commenters checking bait articles at the door makes HN an extremely refreshing and clear-headed place to consume news.

Everyone has their faults and I'm not saying that HN never gets caught up in hype sometimes, but this is the best place to be for a level-headed thoughtful takes on things, and you usually do it while retaining a general optimistic attitude.

So thank you.

Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by laythea on Thursday July 20, 2017 @01:07PM (#14814317)
I second that. HN is good for that reason and also the lack of half page ads on another popular website SD.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by WhitneyLand on Thursday July 20, 2017 @04:05PM (#14815810)
Sorry, SD? The acronym is not clicking, would like to make sure I'm not missing a site with benefits similar to HN, even if it requires viewing a few half page ads. Thanks,
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by nsp on Thursday July 20, 2017 @05:29PM (#14816452)
Slashdot.com - haven't checked it in years but was a similar tech focused site with above average comments, its heyday was late 90s-early 2000s iirc
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by laythea on Friday July 21, 2017 @10:00AM (#14820582)
Sorry - yes Slashdot. It is awful nowadays, but I started there. Somebody should tell them.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by Zuider on Sunday July 23, 2017 @07:49AM (#14831819)
Agreed. Slashdot has become unusable.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by dancsi on Thursday July 20, 2017 @05:46PM (#14816583)
Maybe it is Slashdot?