Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by jjbiotech on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @03:37PM (#14807239)

Phone applications and their data are so abstracted these days, it would be difficult for even an IT expert to differentiate between cloud and local data if search takes place using the device itself (which I assume is what happens). If they connect the phone via USB and browse the contents with a workstation, that might be a different story.

So in practice, nothing has changed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by lb1lf on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @03:41PM (#14807264)

Just put the phone in flight mode.

Wireless interfaces are deactivated, and any attempt at accessing online material is greeted with a message stating that you're offline.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by fuzzybeard on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @03:59PM (#14807387)

Some apps won't let you access any of your content without authenticating with their servers. So even if it's local content, not having an internet connection would deny access. I can envision CBP saying they need to crack your phone to get to the local stuff.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by eridius on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @04:29PM (#14807625)

What apps do that, besides games?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by riffic on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @06:52PM (#14808707)

local data can still be viewable if the device is imaged and the content is unencrypted.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by pavel_lishin on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @04:41PM (#14807715)

And watch the border patrol agent to make sure he doesn't turn it back off?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by riffic on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @06:50PM (#14808692)

Require all searches to be performed in a faraday cage?

A better solution would be to disallow all searches of electronic devices since this seems unnecessarily intrusive.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by askvictor on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @05:52PM (#14808322)

There is also the issue of cached data.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by compiler-guy on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @06:02PM (#14808396)

Cached data is "physically on the phone", and so searchable within the scope of this policy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Travelers just won back a bit of their privacy at the border by chrismeller on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @08:01PM (#14809044)

I was thinking the same thing - for purposes of making a record of the evidence and to ensure some forensic integrity (as well as only obtaining local data) a USB connection is the best approach.

FWIW, my laptop and phone were searched going into Canada and there was no special technology used - the officer just made me unlock them and hand them back to him.

[ Parent | on HN ]