Re:ITER fusion energy pushed back beyond 2050
by dang on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @02:11PM
(#14806489)
So it should say "Tokamak fusion energy pushed back beyond 2050"? I'm worried that this will provoke more objections. The combo of highly technical + controversial makes it hard to get a title like this right.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.