News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ITER fusion energy pushed back beyond 2050 by dang on Wednesday July 19, 2017 @02:11PM (#14806489)
So it should say "Tokamak fusion energy pushed back beyond 2050"? I'm worried that this will provoke more objections. The combo of highly technical + controversial makes it hard to get a title like this right.

There are no comments on this comment yet.