News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end. Parent comment

Re:Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end by andrewingram on Saturday July 15, 2017 @03:36PM (#14778492)
Not quite true. Just because JSX resembles XML, it doesn't mean it can only output XML. Plenty of non-XML render targets exist for React: canvas, terminal, Sketch (I believe the file format is JSON).

The primary restriction is that your output can be modelled as a tree in some way, and what you find is that nearly everything falls into this category. I don't know if anyone's done it yet, but a plain-text renderer is certainly possible, I imagine it would be very similar to a terminal renderer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end by paulddraper on Sunday July 16, 2017 @11:12AM (#14782298)
If you're saying that JSX can do more than XML because you can transform from XML into other things, then yes, that's trivially true.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end by andrewingram on Monday July 17, 2017 @05:55AM (#14786995)
No, I'm saying that JSX isn't XML, it just very loosely resembles it. It can't even naively output XML because it (currently) mandates a single root node, and XML has a doctype node as a sibling to that.

JSX transpiles down to a tree of function calls, it's literally nothing more than that, the only time it might be considered XML is in the final rendered content. Syntactically, JSX isn't even valid XML.

[ Parent | on HN ]