News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Battle for the Internet by vmarsy on Wednesday July 12, 2017 @02:20PM (#14755086)
I don't think your comparison is correct.

> Assuming you have 10mbit internet access for $N/month:

> * Paying +$20/m for 100mbit internet: OK

> * Paying +$20/m for 100mbit access to "Top 100 websites": Not OK

In your car comparison, it would be like :

Assuming you pay for a VW Golf $10000

* Paying +$200k for a Ferrari: OK

* Paying +$200k for a Lamborghini: OK

* Paying +$200k for a Ferrari but +$200k for an equivalent Lamborghini but with an added +$300k of fee just because the container ship company moving the car from Italy to the U.S. asked an extra $300k simply because the container is filled with Lamborghini instead of Ferrari: Not OK

Container companies would never do this because Lamborghini would simply put its containers on the container boat of a concurrent company, because there's competition. But for consumer-facing ISPs, there's plenty of documentation that shows that in many areas around the country, some ISPs have a monopoly, and so for many users, they cannot go to another ISP if they aren't satisfied with their only choice.

Re:Battle for the Internet by 794CD01 on Thursday July 13, 2017 @09:47AM (#14761140)
In other words, the problem is not that people are allowed to pay different prices for different products, but rather the lack of a competitive marketplace? Now we're getting somewhere!