Re:5800sq km iceberg breaks off Antarctica's Larsen C ice shelf
by harryh on Wednesday July 12, 2017 @11:17AM
(#14753249)
Oh totally. I'm just pushing back against the idea that taxes are the solution in and of themselves because sometimes I think people hear that and think "Oh, so I can basically keep doing what I'm doing and just pay a bit more in taxes and things will be fine." when it's really "Massive emissions taxes will make your current lifestyle unaffordable so you will be forced to make significant cuts in your energy consumption."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:5800sq km iceberg breaks off Antarctica's Larsen C ice shelf
by kasey_junk on Wednesday July 12, 2017 @12:06PM
(#14753682)
Right and it will be massive to make a difference. But to me the bigger issue is that the markets are missing a piece of very important information and so are not being very efficient in solving the problem.
If we internalize the costs, it works as a lever to change consumption, but in my view more importantly it makes the markets more able to allocate resources correctly.
Re:5800sq km iceberg breaks off Antarctica's Larsen C ice shelf
by twobyfour on Wednesday July 12, 2017 @11:47AM
(#14753500)
Well, when the problem is externalities (carbon emissions are a cost of certain types of energy production, but a cost not paid for by the producer or consumer), the solution is generally to re-internalize the externalities. Taxes are a pretty efficient way to accomplish that.
What alternatives would you propose?