Re:SFO near miss might have triggered aviation disaster
by nazri1 on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @05:15AM
(#14742657)
Side question: do you think one day commercial pilots aren't necessary anymore, i.e. totally unmanned commercial airlines? If so, how far away in the future are they?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SFO near miss might have triggered aviation disaster
by briandear on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @07:11AM
(#14743138)
There has been some talk of remote piloting (like drones,) but personally, I want whoever is flying the plane to have some skin in the game. Unmanned - fully autopilot aircraft are certainly possible and I sure Boeing probably has a Skunkworks looking into it, but I’ve seen enough source code over the years that I would have a hard time trusting an autonomous airplane unless they had escape pods. Autonomous airplanes seen to be solving a problem that doesn’t seem critical to solve – given the statistically exceptional safety record of commercial air travel. Pilot error is a very rare cause of airliner crashes.
I think electric airplanes powered by Mr. Fusion mini nuclear reactors would be the future I’d like to see!
Re:SFO near miss might have triggered aviation disaster
by gruez on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @09:20AM
(#14743910)
>Pilot error is a very rare cause of airliner crashes.
Is that overall, or as a percentage of all airliner crashes? Because another commenter stated that human error is responsible for most of the crashes.