News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Future Pricing for Atlassian Cloud by shermozle on Sunday July 09, 2017 @10:08PM (#14732925)
The attitude is pretty simple: if the company is stupid enough to insist on self-hosting, they can afford stupid prices. Support on-premise is expensive.
Re:Future Pricing for Atlassian Cloud by solatic on Sunday July 09, 2017 @11:57PM (#14733282)
Atlassian doesn't sell Cloud licenses for instances beyond 2,000 users. At that point, you need to dial up your own "on-premise" Data Center version yourself on AWS in order to scale further - not to mention federated use cases, which Atlassian themselves employ, e.g. a public-facing instance for tracking suggestions and public bug reports, and an internal instance for development itself.

Atlassian Cloud hosting is for small players.

Re:Future Pricing for Atlassian Cloud by svanwaa on Sunday July 09, 2017 @11:30PM (#14733200)
Some industries (financial for example) have to meet regulatory/audit requirements that don't allow for cloud hosting.
Re:Future Pricing for Atlassian Cloud by kejaed on Monday July 10, 2017 @10:35AM (#14736273)
Aerospace and defence too.
Re:Future Pricing for Atlassian Cloud by qaq on Sunday July 09, 2017 @11:11PM (#14733140)
Sure all those smart people who were hosed when AWS East was having issues and their whole development and deployment pipelines got hosed because of all the SaaS services that went down.