Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by dredmorbius on Sunday July 09, 2017 @08:59AM
(#14729539)
The study of the evolution of understanding of geology itself, particularly from the late 18th century, when things started hotting up, is pretty interesting.
A lot of initial observations and attempts to reconcile those with the biblical record, but that didn't add up. Lyell establishing gradualism. Lord Kelvin noting that thermodynamic cooling only allowed for about 30 million years of Earth history (pretty clearly not consistent with the structural geological record). Rutherford, Soddy, and Hardy establishing radioactivity and radiodating. Plate tectonics being proposed (initially as "continental drift"), rejected as patently absurd, and adopted some 50 years later as the fundamental organising principle of geology.
Added gloss from discoveries such as the Chixulub impactor, etc.
Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by thaumasiotes on Sunday July 09, 2017 @02:30AM
(#14728645)
Subterranean rivers of fire is pretty close to how we understand them today.
Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by Pitarou on Sunday July 09, 2017 @02:59AM
(#14728700)
River of fire comes out of the ground. Hmm. Where did it come from?
Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by strictfp on Sunday July 09, 2017 @03:51AM
(#14728808)
There must be a real hellhole down there...
Re:A massive volcano that scientists can't find
by em3rgent0rdr on Sunday July 09, 2017 @06:13AM
(#14729100)
The concept of Hell, being inferred from volcanic eruptions, is not terribly unscientific.
Cool stuff. Really drives home that we are guests of this planet.