Re:This Weekend's DDoS Attack and What's in a (C)Name?
by morecoffee on Saturday July 08, 2017 @07:00PM
(#14727600)
Citation isn't needed. If you read one sentence later in my comment you can see I asked readers to look at their logs to confirm my statement. The next sentence after is confirming with my own data that visitor of my site preferred the no-www.
The reason to not use www is in your logs.
Re:This Weekend's DDoS Attack and What's in a (C)Name?
by hamandcheese on Saturday July 08, 2017 @09:13PM
(#14727936)
Just because your users don't use www doesn't mean that there's any value there above if you had a www only site.
Citation needed.
> I would be willing to bet there is a strong inverse correlation between link size and likelihood of being clicked.
4 extra characters (www.) is a pretty small fraction of the total link length most of the time, when people link to individual blog posts or what have you. I'd argue that readability of the link is far more important, and www does not harm that.