Oh.

When I saw the title, I thought they would start to use GnuPG or PEP or maybe switching from SMTP and MIME to something else.

And then it seems that they're still where the rest of the world was a almost decade ago, and starting implementing TLS.

Yeah, I read the title and assumed basically opposite, that this meant soldiers were going to start visiting one of those ridiculous "Secure E-mail Portals" to find out about upcoming deployments, or whatever else the DOD needs to tell them about via e-mail.

I'm a bit surprised they can even get their email delivered today without having implemented TLS.

I'm curious what GnuPG would offer beyond what they can already do using S/MIME via CAC?

Not much. But, possibly, Ed25519?

But, yeah, I just forgot about S/MIME while I was writing that comment. It's probably a better fit, especially in terms of revocation (OCSP, etc).

Title is misleading; it should say something like encrypting ALL emails.

They have of course been able to encrypt individual emails for at least a decade with their CAC/PKI by checking a box in their email client.

After re-reading the article they never make any mention of existing crypto practices... Seems like purposely misleading or sloppy journalism.

However in the origin article they link to there is a useful gem:

> "STARTTLS is an extension for the Post Office Protocol 3 and Internet Message Access protocols, which rely on username and password for system access," the spokesperson wrote. "To remain compliant with DOD PKI policy, DEE does not support the use of username and password to grant access, and does not leverage either protocol."

I'm not versed in those protocols, but if that statement was true at the time it makes sense to me that the military wouldn't take a step back to using passwords when they already implemented physical tokens (CAC+pin) DoD-wide.

This makes the US military look pretty bad. They should be leading the world in cryptography, not planning to encrypt emails with 2002 tech in 2018. It just goes to show how meaningless the term "military grade encryption" really is.

"military grade encryption" - so strong, the military doesn't use it for soldiers' emails.

Wait. Next year?! They're not encrypted already!?

They need to install backdoors first, duh.

Why bother with backdoors when you're running the infrastructure? They can have a barn sized front door.

I'm assuming this is a reference to key escrow, which they do indeed have already (Audit purposes + ability to make sure older e-mails can be decrypted upon key rotation).

The title of this is pretty misleading. They are not encrypting emails, they are encrypting email traffic. The E-mails will still be plain text _unless_ the user decides to encrypt them, which is functionality that has been around since the mid 2000's.

Isn't that about two decades late?