Re:An ‘Uber for garbage’ picks up steam, and $11.7M in Serie...
by austenallred on Thursday July 06, 2017 @04:44PM
(#14713794)
Why is that inherently better than having it available as a service for a small fee?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An ‘Uber for garbage’ picks up steam, and $11.7M in Serie...
by Broken_Hippo on Thursday July 06, 2017 @05:29PM
(#14714125)
Yes, actually, at least for basic pickup. I'd support it for big/dangerous items as well. It is really easy to let that trash bill go if you get poor, and folks tend to dump things when convenient or burn things that shouldn't really be burned to get rid of their trash. They leave large items in rentals they are moving out of and put dangerous items in with the regular trash.
Sure, communal pickup is flawed - but so far, it seems to be the better solution.
Re:An ‘Uber for garbage’ picks up steam, and $11.7M in Serie...
by austenallred on Thursday July 06, 2017 @06:28PM
(#14714480)
It seems like this is in addition to, not necessarily a replacement for, communal pickup
Re:An ‘Uber for garbage’ picks up steam, and $11.7M in Serie...
by Broken_Hippo on Friday July 07, 2017 @04:47AM
(#14717005)
The trash bill for the poor is that for weekly pickup. Luckily, many poor folks live in cities, where the cost is included in taxes. Get outside city limits in somewhere like Indiana, and you have to pay.