News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Poverty is not a personal choice, but a reflection of soc... by Dylan16807 on Saturday July 01, 2017 @02:47AM (#14675764)
Sure, if you want to ignore that 538 put the odds as a toss-up.

But the types of statistics here are fundamentally different. If you look at the huffington post numbers as how many people will vote for a candidate, then even their prediction is pretty close to correct. A few million votes make the difference between 50% and 99%, but a few million votes is a reasonably tight accuracy range for "how many". Similarly I would expect something like the 80% number to be pretty close to correct, at least based on the definitions chosen.

Re:Poverty is not a personal choice, but a reflection of soc... by haberman on Saturday July 01, 2017 @03:05AM (#14675811)
I don't especially doubt the 80% statistic. I do think it's far overstating the evidence to say that it proves the author's thesis. I think it is far harder to prove the causes of poverty than it is to prove the incidence of poverty. I probably could have been more clear about this. The fault I find with the HuffPo prediction is overconfidence and under-skepticism about the ability of their data to say what they claimed it did.