News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Once a Model City, Hong Kong Is in Trouble by justicezyx on Thursday June 29, 2017 @08:17PM (#14667838)
> Chinese student-spies on American University campuses is a well documented phenomenon [0].

Why "Chinese student protesting" is labeled as "spying". Dalai does want to make a part of China become independent. Without going into the debate into the legitimacy of this claim, can a country's citizen express their own emotion through the right channel? What makes them spy?!

Re:Once a Model City, Hong Kong Is in Trouble by uiri on Thursday June 29, 2017 @11:41PM (#14668502)
The protests themselves are not "spying" per se but rather a tactic used to promote pro-Chinese government propaganda. According to the linked article, members of the student group have been accused of spying.

Straight out of that article:

Li Fengzhi, a longtime employee of the Chinese Ministry of State Security who came to the United States in 2003 as a graduate student at the University of Denver, said that the Chinese government did not see the group so much as a spying operation, but rather as a propaganda and “information collection organization.” Mr. Li eventually defected and was debriefed by F.B.I. counterintelligence agents about the group’s activities.

Re:Once a Model City, Hong Kong Is in Trouble by paradite on Friday June 30, 2017 @11:41AM (#14671424)
> Li Fengzhi, a longtime employee of the Chinese Ministry of State Security who came to the United States in 2003 as a graduate student at the University of Denver, said that the Chinese government did not see the group so much as a spying operation, but rather as a propaganda and “information collection organization.”

I could not find any other sources to cross-reference this information. All the information that I could find about Li Fengzhi (wikileaks, washingtonpost) talks about his link to Ministry of State Security (MSS), and make no mentions of comments made on the student groups. So it would appear that he was talking about MSS when talking about "the group".

- http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/19/exclusive-ch...

- http://voices.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/09/li_fengzhi...

- http://voices.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/10/li_fengzhi...

- https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/12/1231001_re-spytalk-li-...

Of course I could be wrong and NYT had the first hand information on that, but the entire Li Fengzhi story ended in 2010 so it is not likely that NYT had the information without publishing it before 2017.