Re:Inmarsat's European short-haul wi-fi spacecraft launches
by ghaff on Thursday June 29, 2017 @10:00AM
(#14663347)
To each their own I guess. I have no problem spending a long flight without conversation. Some movies/TV shows/books/games and (preferably) a comfortable seat and I'm set. Give me the choice between a business class seat without WiFi and economy with WiFi and the former gets my vote every time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Inmarsat's European short-haul wi-fi spacecraft launches
by nkoren on Thursday June 29, 2017 @04:39PM
(#14666678)
Out of curiosity, how do you define a long flight? I've found that most Americans call a flight "long" if it's 4-5 hours. But in my circles -- London-based, doing business in Asia -- "long" means 9-13 hours. Which is qualitatively very different.
(Mind, in those circumstances, a choice between being able to stretch out in business class vs. having WiFi in coach would tilt even harder towards the former. But after about 8 hours in the air, I do find a lack of communications really starts to bite.)
Re:Inmarsat's European short-haul wi-fi spacecraft launches
by ghaff on Thursday June 29, 2017 @05:25PM
(#14666968)
I fly to both Europe and Asia from the US east coast. Yeah it's boring but mostly because I'm more or less stuck in a seat and not because I'm cut off from email, Facebook, and Twitter. Though, for context, I mostly work remotely so not having a real conversation over the course of a day isn't that unusual for me. The boredom of a long flight is more that I can't go outside and walk around or fiddle around in the kitchen than that I can't communicate with someone.