News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ends, Means, and Antitrust by awinter-py on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @10:22AM (#14654341)
Surprised nobody has interpreted search engine spidering bandwidth as a form of public good. There's a limit to the amount of spidering that can happen. It's okay if 10 or a 100 companies do it, but if everyone had to do it, the web's access pattern would be exponential and overwhelming.

There's a class of consumer who is technically willing and able to operate their own spider but accepts the lesser convenience of a web search because they recognize it would take down the internet if everyone spidered all the time.

Also surprised the article doesn't mention omnibar search. By defaulting this to G, G is 'abusing' browser dominance to reinforce search dominance.

Re:Ends, Means, and Antitrust by xiaoma on Thursday June 29, 2017 @01:54AM (#14661086)
>"the web's access pattern would be exponential and overwhelming."

It might well be overwhelming, but it wouldn't be exponential. There are a maximum of N choose 2 connections between N nodes. That number only grows quadratically as N increases, while exponential growth would outstrip quadratic, cubic or any polynomial growth for large values of N.