Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation
by compuguy on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @10:52AM
(#14645907)
I still think the combined router/modem is the issue. I've worked with one of the combined router/modems with a Comcast business connection before. Very buggy, and Getting the static IPv6 and IPv4 is a herculean task. The Cisco DPC3010 has its own oddities. I would suggest looking at some of the newer cable modems that Comcast supports. If you need static IPv4 though, you have to use Comcast's equipment.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation
by dheera on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @11:34AM
(#14646343)
The combined one works, it's just devoid of features I want, hence the separate modem and router. As for the router the Google one is the only one that seems to work at my startup's place. The other routers I tried only work on my home Comcast line.