News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120M by mysterydip on Saturday June 24, 2017 @06:32AM (#14625122)
What's worse is false positives. It conditions you to ignore any calls you don't immediately recognize, which can have consequences if someone is trying to get ahold of you for some timely legitimate reason. Some people don't leave voicemails, either.
Re:FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120M by ghaff on Saturday June 24, 2017 @06:44AM (#14625148)
Which makes the local ID spoofing especially annoying. I'm pretty sure no one in Florida has a reason to contact me. Someone ostensibly in my town? Not so sure.

Cell phone is actually easier because it's not a very local number anymore. But it also means I have to set it to Do Not Disturb while traveling across time zones. So no one can get me in the middle of the night in a legitimate emergency.

Re:FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120M by dmoy on Saturday June 24, 2017 @11:49AM (#14625965)
This is the one time in my life that I've been glad to have a number from a place I don't live. All the hassle of trying to explain to people that yes, my area code is actually an area code, no it isn't from around here, etc. All absolved when I know I can ignore any number from my area code, 'cus who the hell wants to call me from there? Nobody.
Re:FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120M by khedoros1 on Saturday June 24, 2017 @12:18PM (#14626077)
Mine is from close enough that people recognize it, but far enough that the only people from there that would ever contact me are family members, and of course I already have their numbers programmed in. It is very convenient!
Re:FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120M by jimbobimbo on Saturday June 24, 2017 @02:37PM (#14626826)
If people don't leave a voicemail (or send text), they don't have a "timely legitimate reason" then.