Re:Populism and the Economics of Globalization [pdf]
by throwanem on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @03:11PM
(#14606980)
Perceived as at least pretending to give a shit, then. Her policy agenda might have offered some real solutions for working-class problems - and it might not have; I no longer recall in enough detail to speak confidently without a refresher, but neoliberals have not traditionally been effective in this regard - but what played was "deplorables".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Populism and the Economics of Globalization [pdf]
by anigbrowl on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @03:39PM
(#14607168)
I wholeheartedly agree on this - it was very much a matter of perception. What I was saying in a very long-winded way was that if you ignored all the personality factors and just scored candidates on the policy agenda, the Clinton one was both good (in terms of being thought out in detail) and popular with voters.
Like, the exact same set of policies would have won handily if they had just been offered by somebody else. Martha Stewart for example XD