News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by settsu on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @10:40AM (#14594980)
> Also, most of us run a load just before going to bed, and shuffle it to the dryer in the morning.

Not if you care about the longevity of your clothing and mildew in your washer.

I don't know anyone who does this routinely on purpose.

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by rbanffy on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @05:12PM (#14598662)
Or one could just get a combo washer-dryer that washes and dries your clothes without any intervention.

Considering this sophistication will probably not be easy to retrofit onto current devices, a combined, space/energy saving device is a given. As long as the clothes are dry and clean when I need them, I don't care at what time during the night the machine did its job.

With some extra cleverness, it could even negotiate very-short-term (hours) futures on energy prices based on current tendencies and knowledge of future house demand.

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by londons_explore on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @04:25AM (#14601926)
Energy futures on a "by the minute" basis are great in principle, but they are hampered for consumers by the fact that current billing is flat rate.

Why participate in the future market if one can simply choose to not partipate and get to consume any amount of energy you like at a constant price?

Effectively you'd have built a market with an unlimited option to buy at the monthly-average price. A market like that can't work...

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by rbanffy on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @07:36AM (#14602788)
If you embark in the floating price, you'll probably get better rates. The downside, you having to worry about it, is offset by the machines planning their own consumption within the criteria ("I want this dry in the morning") you set.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by wernercd on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @10:55AM (#14595095)
How much mildew is going to build up if it starts an hour or two later? Or sits in washer for a few hours after finish?

Waiting days? Sure... random-internet-answer(s) seem to hover around 24-48 hours before mildew becomes an issue...

So, sitting over night and then maybe a few hours before the dryer starts (Assuming that, it too, would be on a timer) shouldn't be a major issue.

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by smallnamespace on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @12:33PM (#14596024)
In my personal experience, clothes start smelling funky and 'off' after about 3 hours wet after a wash, and the smell persists even after drying. Only solution is to rewash the entire load.

Also, if you have a front loader, they are extremely prone to growing mildew in the bottom of the rubber gasket. Leaving wet clothes inside makes that much more likely.

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by ljf on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @06:03PM (#14599006)
Is it very warm where you are located? Here in the UK I can sometimes forget washing over night, or 24 hours in the machine (front loader) and not get a problem with smell, any longer and I likely will - and don't worry my wife tells me when it smells off! Never had a problem with mildew in the gasket either - maybe too cold here? Or maybe the weekly hot wash i do keeps the machine clean?
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by askvictor on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @06:47PM (#14599221)
Same here in Melbourne (au), have forgotten clothes in front loader for 24 hours sometimes, and they've been fine. I guess it's either climate, or front loader, or appliance hygiene. Or a combination thereof
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by stevep98 on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @02:26PM (#14597154)
I find this depends a lot on where you are. In my house in California, I can leave the clothes in the washer a lot longer. In florida, the washer is already stinking most of the time. Even if I disinfect the washer occasionally with bleach, it still ends up stinking again. I put this down to the general humid environment.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by yardie on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @07:17PM (#14599360)
Do you close the door on the washer? We have front loading washer and leave the door slightly ajar. When it's completely sealed the darkness and humidity are a breeding ground for mold.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by jacquesm on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @04:48PM (#14598474)
Could be the water quality as well.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by ams6110 on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @09:09PM (#14599878)
Florida water stinks like a swamp right out of the tap.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by hinkley on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @12:56PM (#14596239)
White vinegar in the prewash will kill the mildew smell.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by Pamar on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:12PM (#14596404)
White vinegar can also help when washing clothes that tend to bleed color (e.g. Just-bought dark blue jeans). Wash these once with white vinegar and the color should "stabilize".
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by hinkley on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @03:51PM (#14607281)
I buy that stuff by the gallon. If you live in a high humidity area it has so many uses.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by Retric on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @04:54PM (#14598523)
If a washing machine waits up to say 30 minutes unless you click the fast button, that's still quite a bit of time shifting in aggregate. Same for home heating/cooling, you might be willing to shift an extra 1-2 degrees if it will save a few dollars a month and you don't need to pay attention. However, if your willing to spend a few extra dollars a month that directly pays for grid storage.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by thisrod on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @07:09PM (#14599327)
Yes. This only matters for half an hour, once a year, when there isn't enough wind or sunlight to generate electricity. It's OK for a washer to just say no if you try to switch it on in that half hour, and maybe that makes more sense than buying a large battery that only gets used once a year. The timing can be forecast, and the news would warn you the night before.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by Retric on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @07:17PM (#14599358)
The US grid already has a lot of storage in hydropower systems. So, I doubt a washing machine would ever need to say no.

Further the once a year useage is going to be drawing a lot of batteries slightly lower at the cost of slightly shorter lifespans not a single bank that's only used once. Plus some emergency back up generators that flip on and use some minimal amount of fuel at hospitals and data centers etc.

PS: One interesting outgrowth from high wind solar production is likely to be fairly accurate models for electricity costs over the next few hours. So, you may be using power sooner if the prediction is a coming price increase.

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by ams6110 on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @09:08PM (#14599872)
You need to bleach your washing machine if clothes are getting funky after three hours.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by EGreg on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @11:10AM (#14595188)
The solution is straightforward:

Automate the washing, drying and folding of clothing.

Automate cooking. And shopping.

And so on. Like self-driving cars.

Then it can be done while you sleep :)

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by erikpukinskis on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:26PM (#14596535)
Cooking and folding clothes aren't going to be automated for a long time. Fine motor control is a hard problem that has resisted automation for decades. GPUs and RNNs don't help.

You need fingertips with lots of nerves, and probably thousands of very nuanced motor control paradigms.

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by vinceguidry on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:49PM (#14596804)
I'd be happy with just laying the clothes flat so they don't wrinkle. That way I can get to it whenever. Especially if they're pressed first.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by vezycash on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @02:11PM (#14597012)
Buy wrinkle resistant clothes - they can be washed without needing pressing.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by vinceguidry on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @04:19PM (#14598218)
No thanks, my current workflow works just fine.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by Retric on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:56PM (#14596892)
There are demos of robots folding random laundry. They are slow and expensive, but that's the stuff that improves over time.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by jimktrains2 on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @05:59PM (#14598987)
Sure, actual cooking won't be. However, taking a frozen entrée and heating it could very easily be automated.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by tonyedgecombe on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @02:53PM (#14597395)
Cooking has been automated for many people for a long time, all they need to do is open the microwave door.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by euyyn on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @01:48PM (#14596786)
Automate sleep too?
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by shuntress on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @02:12PM (#14597024)
As in, the process in the brain? Because if I could turn on 'sleep mode' while maintaining enough consciousness to perform basic tasks/hobbies then several hours later turn off 'sleep mode' to regain full consciousness and feel fully rested then _YES_ sign me up for automated sleep.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by adrianN on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @02:25PM (#14597148)
Some people call that mode a meeting.
Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by Razengan on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @07:37PM (#14599459)
Or make sleep more efficient.

Sleep pods (or smart beds as they'll be more likely to be called if invented any time soon) that repair your body and inject you with nutrients, making you feel as good as new when you wake up, to the point of not needing sleep again for a few days.

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by EGreg on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @11:57AM (#14604879)
Pretty sure you will always need sleep every day for optimal functioning. Unless you have nanobots cleaning things up maybe.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/brain-may-flus...

Re:Storage ‘not fundamentally needed’ for future power grid,... by euyyn on Wednesday June 21, 2017 @04:12PM (#14607475)
I could totally use the "making you feel as good as new when you wake up" part, though.