Re:The secret negotiations behind the Hong Kong handover
by zie on Monday June 19, 2017 @05:40PM
(#14590679)
The end of what autonomy HK currently enjoyes expires in 2047. Will be interesting to see what happens then. China has always been very long-term thinking oriented, much different than our western system(s) of government, that it has an expiry I think says a lot about China's long-term view.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The secret negotiations behind the Hong Kong handover
by Analemma_ on Monday June 19, 2017 @08:25PM
(#14591393)
My guess is nothing: by 2047, the erosion of Hong Kong's autonomy and democracy will have progressed to the point where it's indistinguishable from China anyway, so nothing will have to change.
Re:The secret negotiations behind the Hong Kong handover
by teknologist on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @04:00AM
(#14592860)
I see janitors (called ayis here in China) walking around the office gambling their life savings on stock trading apps. Long term planning at work?
Re:The secret negotiations behind the Hong Kong handover
by ihaveajob on Monday June 19, 2017 @06:57PM
(#14591052)
I'll take politicians who know they're up for periodic reelection over what they have in China any time.
Re:The secret negotiations behind the Hong Kong handover
by r00fus on Monday June 19, 2017 @07:24PM
(#14591166)
The problem is that the lobbyists and civil servants do not have any re-election or term limits.
So you have replaceable pols who are a facade to the real influence being brokered by chiefs of staff, head lobbyists - and the distinction between the lobbyists and civil staff is blurred at best.
Re:The secret negotiations behind the Hong Kong handover
by icebraining on Tuesday June 20, 2017 @03:37PM
(#14597804)
Bernard: The Department of Employment lobbies for the TUC, whereas the Department of Industry lobbies for the employers. It's rather a nice balance. Energy lobbies for the oil companies, Defence lobbies for the armed forces, the Home Office lobbies for the police and so on.
Hacker: So the whole system is designed to stop the Cabinet from carrying out its policies?
Bernard: Well, somebody's got to.
-- Yes, Minister